Czar Chart
A new Manager In A Strange Land is up.
Before I submit my articles, I e-mail out at work for opinions and feedback. This article generated more controversy than any other I've written, including the one on crunching.
Michael Vance pointed out that he couldn't imagine doing things any other way, and that I was basically attacking a straw man.
Tom Henderson, on the other hand, wants--not a rock star, necessarily, but a guy, or a small tightly knit team, in charge of vision, that cannot be overruled, that can get into any and all dishes and say, "This is the way it's going to be." And I'm fine with that: you could have a slot on the czar chart whose responsibility is vision, or you could have an org chart that's two layers deep: the one guy in charge and everyone else. I see the czar chart not as a replacement for the org chart but the chart you make visible and emphasize; the org chart is for emergencies. Also, the guy at the top isn't going to get his way by saying, "Look, see this chart? I'm on top. That means I get to say." He has to earn it, the way Tomo Moriwaki does on our team, by demonstrating his talent and knowledge and earning our respect and trust. Tom was in the military, by the way...so he may have a bias toward clear lines of authority.
Unless the guy at the top owns the company, of course, in which case he can do whatever the hell he wants, although earning authority will still be a more effective management technique than, "Do it or you're fired." (And if the guy at the top owns a single-team company - there's no reason for an org chart. Everyone knows who's at the top.)

I'm surprised that this was controversial at Treyarch. It makes perfect sense to me.
My company is an interesting mix - we have czars who all answer to the "rock star" in the end. As we've expanded, we've been working to further empower everyone on the teams to take more ownership/responsibility. The results have been nothing but positive. It helps that our "rock star" sees the value in this, and has been willing to loosen the reigns.
Bottom line - your people are not idiots! Give them a chance to really kick ass!
Posted by: Brian Krueger | March 15, 2004 at 10:11 AM
I usually consider "rock star" to be a derogative term. Someone with an exceptional skill level but without the experience or personality to apply it in the right way. Certainly not someone who should be holding the reins.
Posted by: Martin Donlon | March 15, 2004 at 06:02 PM
i found this link by googling myself after hearing a story about it on KCRW. i dont participate in blogs and would appreciate not using my name for any reason without my prior knowledge.
Posted by: kevin pasko | August 05, 2004 at 09:42 AM
This one time, I emailed Ernest W. Adams and I called him "Ernest" and he got all huffy and said something like "*I* would never address a *stranger* by their *first name*."
Man, what a Kevin Pasko.
Posted by: anonymous | August 05, 2004 at 03:47 PM
Sir! I insist you stop invoking my name in such a casual manner. You are obviously an obsessed individual. I suggest this blog avoid the use of proper names in the future as doing so may provoke Derek Smart to taunt it again.
Posted by: Ernest W Adams | August 05, 2004 at 05:26 PM